Continuity Lost: How Legacy Drives Political Agendas
Continuity Lost: How Legacy Drives Political Agendas
by Christian Jay Laya
When successors deny or dismantle the legacies of their predecessors, it reflects a recurring pattern in Philippine politics that continues to this day. Rather than building on the policies or programs of their forerunners, many politicians focus on charting their own distinct path, often at the expense of continuity. This approach is rooted in the desire to establish a lasting imprint on history—a "legacy" that becomes synonymous with their name.
The New Manila International Airport Terminal 1 was viewed as one of the World's most modern structures during its opening in 1982. Designed by National Artist Leandro V. Locsin/
Source: Docu Lico
This obsession with legacy can lead to a cycle where every new administration resets priorities, sometimes discarding worthwhile initiatives simply because they are associated with a previous leader. While the desire for individuality and achievement is understandable, this mindset often comes at a cost: the progress and sustainability of long-term national programs. In some cases, it even results in political rivalry being prioritized over the greater good of the country.
The fixation on legacy, therefore, not only highlights the personal ambitions of politicians but also underscores the challenges in fostering a governance culture that values continuity and collaboration over self-promotion.

Comments
Post a Comment